Author Complaint Process


Before submitting manuscripts, authors are requested to read all the guidelines and policies regarding processing and publication of the manuscript.

How to complaint?

The authors have the right to complaint and ask explanation if they perceive any misconduct in any applicable policies and ethical guidelines. The authors can raise their complaints by submitting a letter to: [email protected].

All the complaints regarding delinquencies in the work processes are investigated according to the prevailing publication ethics practices.

Complaints categorization

An author or any other scholar may submit their complaints about any issues related to:

  • Plagiarism
  • Copyright violation
  • Deceiving in research results or wrong research results
  • Violations in set standard for research
  • Unrevealed conflicts of interest
  • Bias in review process
  • Manuscript processing time is unusually late
  • The peer-review comments are unsatisfactorily
  • Authorship issues

Policy for Dealing with Complaints

Once a complaint is received, at first an acknowledgement is sent to the complainant with assurance that appropriate action will be taken on complaint within three working days excluding the complaint receiving date.

The investigation process is initiated by the Journal handling team according to the directions of the Editor-In-Chief. After the investigation is over, a meeting is held with complete report on the complaint. The decision is taken in and the same is forwarded to the concerned scholar through his submitted email ID.

We consider complaints as an opportunity to enhance our existing Manuscript Processing System. All the received complaints are dealt in polite and timely manner with a certainty.

Indexing/Archiving

Editor-in-Chief

Peter J Catalano
Tufts University, USA
Archives of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
Prof. Pierre Guertin
Laval University, Canada
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Developmental Research
Giorgio Bianciardi
University of Siena, Italy
International Journal of Oral and Craniofacial Science
Dr. Pierre Guertin
Laval University, Canada
Archive of Gerontology and Geriatrics Research
Emmanouil Magiorkinis
Metaxas Memorial Anticancer Hospital , Greece
Annals of Bone Marrow Research
M.Waheed Roomi
Dr. Rath Research Institute
1260 Memorex Drive, Santa Clara, USA
Global Journal of Cancer Therapy
Miklas Scholz
Lund University, Sweden
Annals of Environmental Science and Toxicology
Ray Marks
Columbia University, USA
Journal of Novel Physiotherapy and Physical Rehabilitation
Erich Cosmi
University of Padua, Italy
Journal of Gynecological Research and Obstetrics
Dong Zhao
China University of Political Science and Law, China
Forensic Science Today

NIH Funded Articles

Hepatitis B Vaccination Rate in Patients with Diabetes: Assessment of Racial and Socioeconomic Disparity Ethnic Differences in Abstinence Self-Efficacy among Recovering Individuals Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Significance of Cancer Stem Cells in Anti-Cancer Therapies Buprenorphine Maintenance for Opioid Dependence in Public Sector Healthcare: Benefits and Barriers How Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury was averted during Knee Collapse in a NBA Point Guard Diabetic Retinopathy: Focus on Minority Populations Variation among gari samples of some yellow cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) varieties for change in color during storage Intranuclear inclusions in conventional clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC): A case report and review of the literature Neural Response During a Mechanically Assisted Spinal Manipulation in an Animal Model: A Pilot Study

Research Articles

Acute on Chronic Renal Failure has Worse Postoperative Outcomes than End-Stage Renal Disease Following Cardiac Surgery
April 04, 2017Active Navigation in a Hepatitis B Program: Screening, Vaccination and Patient Assistance for Asian Americans in Michigan
August 20, 2018Factors Associated with the Occurrence of Urogenital Bacterial Infections in Pregnant Women at a Reference Hospital in Cameroon
October 29, 2024

Peertechz Publications Google Reviews

×
  • 4.4
View All Reviews Write a Review
  • A

  • Anna Maria

Each step from submission to publication was handled efficiently. The review comments were accurate which increased the value of our revised manuscript. I will certainly publish more works with Peertechz.More

  • C

  • cantrella caralynn

It was found that each step in the submission and publishing process was handled efficiently. The reviewers were clearly experts in the field and our revised manuscript was dealt with value.More

  • S

  • Samantha Wyatt

The entire review and production process for the article has been handled with remarkable professionalism and efficiency. As the editor, I can appreciate the enormous organizational effort and discipline shown.More

  • MUSHTAQ CHALKOO

Tomorrow is a search of today and if we research,we add an another day,that is how the time pulls on and on.Science keeps on changing its facies and thus paradigm and makes our living interesting and awesome.The knowledge of science needs to be dissipated to the progeny for better living ahead and the way we do that is through scientific journals published by different publication houses.Being associated with peertechz publications has been a wonderful experience.i have enjoyed the true spirit of scientific spice serving the organisation as an editor.It is author friendly,and makes the publication process for you very easy taking care not to jeopardise the standards of true science.I would suggest the research scholars and young scientists to associate with this publication house ,submit your reseach to brighten your career ahead in science.let us keep up the spirit of spreading the true science to the world ahead.More

  • Dr Shivaji Jadhav

Wonderful ..process and indeed very good way in terms of communication and i recommend for publishing with this publishers...Great support.More

View All Reviews